Schiller v. Schiller, 625 So. 2d 856 (Fla. DCA 1993). Trial court could not distribute husband's partnership interest to wife; instead, it could impose a charging lien on the partnership interest for a specific dollar amount.
Williams v. Williams, 683 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).
The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it reduced the value of the husband's stock in his law firm by 20% because he held only a minority interest in the firm and the stock was not readily marketable.
Weinstock v. Weinstock, 634 So. 2d 775 (Fla. DCA 1994).
Inclusion of good will as a marital asset was improper because the evidence failed to establish a value for the good will apart from the husband's continued presence.
Staman v. Staman, 622 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. DCA 1993). Accounts receivable from husband's medical practice should have been included in the valuation of marital assets.